Archie Moore Harold Johnson Roland Lastarza Rocky Marciano Tommy Jackson
Standing up to him is part of it. But certainly not everything. You’re def not gonna win if you don’t stand up to the bully. But that doesn’t mean...
ALL fighters get smarter as they get older. It’s natural for all of them. I don’t think his skill set improved all that much besides a few minor...
He was prime. He was 42-0-1 and was already fighting fir titles for five years. The idea that he wasn’t in prime is absurd
Any list of greatest boxing fights needs Gatti v Ward in the top section
That’s kind of a silly argument…he was a prime version of a guy who would be considered a top 100 fighter. He hadn’t accumulated the wins yet but...
Canelo obviously. Maybe Delahoya. JMM maybe
Couldn’t murder a worse fighter in Holyfield. I wouldn’t bet on it.
Bowe does have the skills to win…but watching the Holy fights and Bowes tendencies to leave himself open against a machine like Marciano may be...
Louis destroys Bowe with his shabby defense. Marciano as well if he starts brawling. Those two have the best shot
Excellent and fair points.
I don’t think mid fifties were bad. You had Archie Moore, Maxim, Patterson, Harold Johnson, Pastrano, Durrell. Although as the decade progressed...
Have they though? Historically that doesn’t seem to be the case. A list of lighter men who moved up to win the hw crown or piece of it Braddock...
Joe Louis Marciano Charles Dempsey Archie Moore Harold Johnson Quarry
Max Baer v Primo is extremely entertaining brawl. Baer v Schmeling was good too.
