Not for me
Difficult question, i think he was probably at his best at light heavy but thats arguable, i always find it hard to pin down a specific division...
Bollocks, robinson was not a counter puncher in most of his fights with la motta and fought with him toe to toe, hearns was not a counter puncher,...
Your post makes **** all sense. La motta was not a counter puncher, neither was mayorga, neither was duran, shane mosely was never a master...
Here's a little footage og gomez at his best, against carlos zarate and juan antonio lopez (footage quality's a bit poor i'm afraid), at least...
That best ever mexican list is crying out for ruben olivares, he could possibly be the best ever though i do rate chavez slightly higher....
Are you serious, gomez pre sanchez at 122 was one of the most complete fighters i've ever seen, he was better than barrera, pretty clearly so in...
Duran v leonard Basillio v Robinson
Light heavyweight for me,the reason for this is that i fell that this was probably sam langford's best weight, it was definetly ezzard charles...
Ranking hearns over robinson and leonard, i can see no feasible reason for that. Robinson is pretty clearly the best welter ever, leonard second IMO
Floyd wins this one i'm almost certain, he can do every thing that marquez does and most of it he is better at, faster hands, better defence, more...
Hearns will pump his jab in mayweather face all night, mayweather has never enjoyed facing a good jab, the reach advantage hearns has negates...
Floyd has no shot against hearns, hearns is the worst fighter floyd could face at 147 or below.
Duran is better than floyd. Floyd does not beat any of the 4 you mentioned
edit
