Harold was 26 years old and had 52 pro fights when he fought Archie Moore for the title. He was smack in the middle of his prime. Johnson's...
Lol
i don’t need to. I see Marcianos top opponents on film. They look great. Nothing more needs to be said. You vastly underrate them
[MEDIA] best footage I’ve seen :47 seconds Louis hands are blazing fast.
Williams was a more dangerous fighter than Valdes. Bigger punch, faster hands, faster movement, bigger and stronger physically
everyone knows chokelab has a man crush on 50s euro heavyweights and dislikes the American heavyweights of the late 50s
I’m a mega Liston fan and rate him higher than most but this poster Liston73 gravely underrates marcianos Opposition
It doesn’t matter who was “prime”. What matters is who was better? Unequivocally the 1955 version of Archie Moore was better than any version of...
Archie Moore and Ezzard Charles qualify as slick counter punchers Archie Moore was 45-1 coming into the Marciano fight and went 28-3 afterward...
But Machen lost to Harold Johnson right? Didn’t 38 year old Archie Moore knock out a better version of Harold in 1954? and Walcott was 38 but...
Machen got demolished in one round by ingos bingo yet 3 out of 4 posters here picked Machen over a prime Marciano didn’t Marciano make a career...
incredible resume looked unbelievable in his biggest fights vs hall of famers one of the greatest all around skilled fighters on film
Larry Holmes he kicked me and punched me!
Bonavena. Stronger better and Bigger. He would maul Rex for a decision
Walcott was a two fisted assassin in Marciano I. He packed speed and heat in that left hook walcott was in great shape and battered Marciano...
