:rofl
I just don't think Spinks did enough to "take" the belt from Larry in either fight.
I think what he means is that Lucas is a well-schooled, clinical pressure fighter as opposed to a brawler/slugger like Maidana...who Khan...
Probably move up and blame his loss on being "weght drained"...
Your examples mean nothing because Spinks was better than all of the guys you mentioned.
:huh WHAT?
First, he fought a peak Mercer when he was 43 years old. Secondly, to answer you question...if you throw the Berbick and Mercer wins in with...
:lol:... Spinks(He won the first one at the very least) Berbick Norton Shavers Spoon Evangelista Mercer( Holmes was like 43 yrs old!) Not to...
What? If he isn't upper tier, who is? Have you actually seen any of his fights? Regarding the Spinks fight ,please rewatch the first one and tell...
:clap:Well done my friend.
He wanted to capitilize on his win over Hopkins and get a big money fight. There was no other way to make that kind of money other than to go down...
Totally agree. That kind of main event would need a strong undercard...
You can't be serious...
Seth definitely has the tenacity, physical strength and mental toughness to contend for a belt but let's not jump the gun...
This. Plus, even if he wanted to Diaz wouldn't let him. That's why their partnership works so well...
