barrera probably thought the same thing in his first fight against pac. :hey
yep. these were certainly great performances by pac. but most boxing fans here don't know these certain facts about him.
hmm... it was actually two weeks notice? then it's like in the ledwaba fight.
actually, pac was a late sub for the 1st barrera fight. i think pac was given only about a month's notice. and jmm also ignored guzman, choosing...
yep. pavlik deserves it.
actually, in morales and barrera, we're talking about two of the 5 greatest mexican fighters of all time.
well, it seems that the Ring and their ratings panel composed of many different boxing journalists treated that fight as a fluke too as evidence...
so, that does mean that Ring treated the raheem fight as a fluke after alll...
well, calzaghe hasn't faced an elite, prime fighter ever. kessler is definitely prime but not elite. hopkins is still elite but not prime. morales...
hmm... the raheem fight was Sept. 2005. but Ring in its year-end 2005 p4p rankings still lists erik @ #6. so, that means even Ring treated the...
i dunno... baldo is a very big welterweight but past his prime. it would probably go like the collazo fight with hatton winning a close decision...
i think those were year-end p4p rankings. i recall that before the first erik-pac fight, pac was @ #5 while erik #7. then after that, erik went...
morales was certainly in the top 10 p4p during that time. everyone treated the raheem fight as a fluke. and morales was certainly still an elite...
pac KO'd a prime mab in 2003 and morales was still a top 5-7 p4p fighter when pac KO'd him in the second fight. sasakul was an elite fighter when...
kessler is certainly an A-level fighter but he's not elite. that means calzaghe still doesn't have an elite level fighter in his resume yet. so,...
