well i dont know what tunney would have really said..i mean..i think even tunney knew he never faced the best dempsey....
honestly i have only seen a few witter fights...so i cant really try for a predication.....
in fairness the comparison of collazo is off a bit in so far as collazo is a naturally bigger man who was also a good boxing slick south...
i actually think paz will get hit more then hatton..even though paz has "better" defense...he still got hit a good bit..i gotta go hatton on...
Beating a man over 3 rounds of sparring with bigger gloves and maybe headgear (I know dempsey often used headgear) is far different then a 15...
Paz faster...hatton stronger/hits harder...
well..he isnt a great boxer to be sure....but he does have a winning boxing record..id say you have to be a pretty good boxer to beat him.:think
Yea ok...now your just talking ****.
Well Davis was Camacho's 18th fight, the first Haugen fight, a loss for Camacho was his 25th fight. Are you really trying to say that Camacho...
I don't buy the notion that he lost that much between those two fights....my guess would be it just took a while for Camachos failings to show....
Can we really say that Camacho lost that much from Davis to haugen.
Well I think Haugen had some strenghts...but at his best he wasn't in the same league as Hatton at his best. But Haugen held macho to a close...
Camacho did fight life and death with Haugen...is Ricky less of a fighter then Greg?
Camacho has all the tools to get the win...but somehow I feel like he doesn't.
No its not a majority draw...close fight but matthysse won it
