why does it always come down to my preference... i honestly dont care who it may have been... this system would usually in all cases support the...
I dont see how... I mean no system is full proof because its subjective... but this would atleast remove some subjectivity...it would take the...
good post... because for example... in the case of a split decision.... and one judge incorrectly gives a fighter 2 rounds he CLEARLY didnt...
yeah but this system of averaging out the scores makes it a lot less subjective..... like i said... if you add up the judges score cards round by...
because look at the contradiction... andre dirrell lost the fight yet in the eyes of the judges on average he won the majority of the fight the...
nah... its 7-5 dirrell the point deduction made it 6-5... you didnt read my op properly edit: nice try tho
you are right but i feel like this would atleast reduce bad decisions a little bit.... especially my first idea
The Overall Consensus of this fight is that dirrell won... obviously fights are not scored like this but based on the majority decision (round by...
Here's Another example that i wrote ... this is from another thread... I would Like Everyone To notice Something Very Important!!! If you take...
good point...that would be some freak show ****.... i guess well just stick with my first idea for now lol
I would Like Everyone To notice Something Very Important!!! If you take all 3 judges score cards and average them out (which is how fights should...
you think 6 pictures justifies carl froch "NOT" missing dirrell all night? which he did.... those is like the only punches he landed in the fight
I Just thought of this and I am certain it would eliminate at least 75% of the poor decisions our fight is faced with.... this idea would remove...
so lets imagine for one second if the roudns that were obviously dirrells .. were actually giving to him instead of the judges dicking him...
Vote & Add On...
