you think groves woulda got up from that? i didn't realize that respected media outlets employed froch fanboys. again, thanks.
if they ain't grandstanding then they ain't learnt a thing from the 1st fight.
too tough and too durable against a man too fragile is the consensus of at least half.
bless 'em, they know how to bear a grudge.
armstrong tested positive, it was covered up. this is a matter of record.
so that's the "majority" as long as you look in 1 journal only. thanks.
why wouldn't there be ped experts on here? those that aren't are certainly quoting 1!
nobody claimed he lost in court. settled was the term used.
brian potter
no, you're just repeating the bull**** arguments floyd wants you to. can't argue with year-round testing, but there has to be absolute...
and if you think the fact it was settled out of court lends a positive slant for floyd, you are ****ing tripping!
they got their retraction. love how you keep shifting the argument, so what if jmm passed? how is that pertinent to my answer to your question re...
he passed every ped test. you suspect pac because of a smear campaign by the mayweathers so effective you don't even see it, dismissing successful...
holy knew he had more chance of passing a test than winning a case!
it's only fair to point out you just used evan fields as an example to support your argument.
