is it? are they? the more pertinent question is: why are you so desperate to get him away from 154?
we don't know, but that's not the likeliest scenario. i still favour froch because although they're both good at administering punishment, froch...
i was surprised at how heavily he was breathing so early in the fight. and if his stamina means he can't defend against so leaden an opponent as...
make your mind up. do we listen to what boxers say or not?
i prefer to deal in probabilities. we can't rule out a 2nd wind, but they're the exception, not the rule. we can't rule out froch being equally...
and gassing by the end. my point is to those claiming he chose to get drawn into a tear up, when he was too knackered to keep froch at bay.
he said himself he needed to work on stamina! you gonna deny that too? it's hard for you to envisage anything else, but you're pretending froch...
it's amazing how many of you are still in denial about the 1st fight. gg didn't choose to go toe-to-toe, he gassed. he's as good as admitted it....
hatton's a poor example, he also was an undefeated world champ with a massive fanbase.
never heard that 2nd 1. along with everybody else, ever.
not yet. maybe if he wore a monocle and spoke with a lisp...
we'll never find out how it would've gone, just how the rematch goes. undecided between a couple of mates' yards and the pub, but enjoy!
i'm talking in terms of likelihoods, not foregone conclusions. i don't think the rematch will be as good, and though a groves win wouldn't be a...
bull****, i had gg shading the 1st but it was far from a schooling. and gg was disadvantaged by fighting a man shaking off concussion? wow. grasp...
he was disciplined in early rounds v kessler 2. he was caught with that gg right hand repeatedly but didn't drop, i don't accept it was because...
