then you are, at very best, naïve.
not his 1st time, no point mentioning it though, people take a view and stick to it regardless.
you live and learn, thanks!
nice option to have!
really? that's about 1/2 of the households in the country, i'm surprised.
careful, you don't wanna set her off again.
i'm not asking for proof of negotiation, as already stated, i'm asking you for proof froch doesn't want the fight, after you asked me for proof he...
and when ward said that, on live british tv, he was still out injured. and despite his bravado, there's no way he wanted as tough a test as froch...
it's on box office but i doubt there'll be many takers from non sky sports subscribers.
drop a mandatory in order to fight a man who still hadn't made his comeback and fancied a soft touch (his 1st 2 choices were rejected by hbo)....
i'm not sure there are even 1 million sky sports subscribers in the uk.
so ward would drop dawson for froch 2? and then before ward had even made his comeback, froch should have dropped his mandatory against groves?...
i'll ask again, when should froch have tried to make the fight, when ward was injured? or should he just drop the groves rematch and his biggest...
when should froch have offered to rematch ward? when he was injured? he hadn't even fought when making those comments on sky, and since then froch...
i should add, each of your fictitious quotes are the opposite of your own, oft repeated beliefs, perfectly highlighting your own double standards....
