Yup. At the end of the day, Wladimir was universally recognized as the undisputed champion from when Vitali retired even without the WBC belt.
Also, think about this, since Lewis gave up the IBF belt in 2002 until Wlad lost to Fury in 2015, there was only one UNIFIED heavyweight champion....
You didn't prove anything. The facts are: Wlad COULDN'T fight for the WBC belt between 2013 and 2015. Firstly, he wasn't allowed to fight for the...
:roflmao:
Maybe, but the most important thing about this is: they don't freakin' deserve the shot at the title.
You're jumping around the question my man. Was Wlad rated by the WBC in December 2013 to be legible to fight for their vacant belt? If not, how...
Was Wlad rated by the WBC when the belt became vacant or not?
Not ranking champions of other organizations.
Bookies are not interested in fantasy match ups.
Now... That was disrespectful, lol.
Byrd was the mandatory for the IBF belt, but Lewis chose to pursue a rematch with Tyson instead of fighting him and vacated the belt.
Wlad literally defeated every top contender there was before Vitali came back in 2008 and after he went MIA in 2012. That's literally 5 years of...
Well, yeah. He couldn't fight for the WBC belt when Vitali held it for an obvious reason and when he finally could, he wasn't allowed to because...
So, Wlad is responsible for WBC having a stupid policy of not ranking the champions of other bodies and sanctioning the fight between 2 second...
Well, yeah, he messed all the way up. But in Brewster fight he had his sugar level way over the top, so I would look for this to be an additional...
