which is why nobody on this thread has suggested it. hasn't stopped you being the 2nd to carry on about it, though.
except you, who somehow thinks the likeliest scenario is the exact opposite of what you witnessed last time. where's your logic? froch tried to...
even benn? the man who finished mclennan?
how come you keep coming on this thread yet won't answer my questions earlier on?
i see you're still struggling with the moral compass concept.
2 months recovery can be plenty, depending on the injury. was brook ducking when alex pulled out?
it was inevitable the moment you clicked submit reply.
you either watched the 1st fight backwards or thought the ginger 1 was froch.
blue cheese keeps you up.
froch has made a career of beating better boxers and that coupled with i do think there are still question marks against gg means i favour froch...
then i wasn't referring to you. no concerns over gg's stamina?
no, the idiots are the casuals squealing "gg can ko froch at will" while failing to explain why he didn't last time.
speaking of idiots...
he won, idiot. don't bother. this halfwit ssg is as bad with geography as he is debating. still awaiting his response on the eubank thread.
why do floyd fans pretend he gets singled out? wlad does get criticized for his level of opposition, while never claiming to be goat.
