Like i say, Roy Jones the artist, Hopkins the scientist. Mayorga is a low level artist for example:lol:
Okay, i'm applying the art v science theorem to boxing. I've been thinking about this for a while. Here's a little background just in case...
I agree with the inconsistent theory, but Mayweather has shown fine footwork, the display against Marquez is a footwork masterclass, albeit...
Larry Holmes-6 Lennox Lewis-4 Mike Tyson-2 Evander Holyfield-2 Marvin Hagler-4 Thomas Hearns-1 Roberto Duran- 1 Floyd Patterson- 1 Jack...
I thought Floyd's adjustments vs Oscar and Judah are the best examples of him doing so myself, especially against Oscar anyway.
Thanks for that, even though this fight is bull****, i love promo **** like this, build-up to fights man, it's quality.
Are we including fighters they lost to?
Let's not take this thing out of context though, they both did what they did and Lewis>Bowe.
It's obvious to no end that 'skills' doesn't mean that.
:good Whitaker was born to box, it's ridiculous how good he was. No stylistic mentions needed, just amazing period.
This would be an amazing boxing match btw, guaranteed.
Whitaker was definitely the better inside technician. PP said Mayweather is underrated inside and that's true of the people who claim he has no...
Gomez for me, Chandler was a quality fighter so it's clearly not easy for Gomez. But i do think Gomez would be better at all ranges and that...
:good
I like Buchanan