true. you got a point there.
chavez is mexico's greatest fighter ever and a top 10 ATG. pac may end up as the greatest asian fighter ever but i still think chavez wins this one.
chavez was at a different level compared to both erik and mab... i'm a pac fan but i have to admit that pac loses this one.
i guess the first fight with pac took a lot out from erik even if he won that fight. like i said in a previous post, erik was visibly hurt in that...
that right hook was a big difference between the first and second pac-morales fights. pac was able to use this strong right hook counter when erik...
people here tend to forget that pac was moving up from 126 when he and erik fought for the first time. it was pac's first fight as a 130lber....
pac was a late replacement for the ledwaba fight since the orig opponent of ledwaba withdrew two weeks before the fight. luckily, pac was training...
izzy does seem to have a better chin than rafa. in their two fights, it's 3-0 in KDs in favor of izzy.
probably jmm due to his technical skill. but of course, if jmm loses that one, many here would say that jmm is already "old and "faded". :-(
it was a schooling... not a bashing. even though he won, the first pac fight probably took a lot out of erik and raheem was just the beneficiary...
you're giving the light-punching raheem too much credit. pac certainly hit erik with much harder shots in their first fight especially in the 12th...
hmm... i guess you didn't get the essence of my post then.
if we always have to go to these "faded" or "shot" arguments all the time, then elite fighters like pac and hatton will never get the proper...
even when erik won the first fight w/ pac, he was never the same after that. erik made the mistake of going southpaw and trading w/ pac in that...
well, this "shot" morales should've won this fight and become a 4-division champ. it's those damn judges that should be shot.
