it's easy to look impressive against a guy who lost 2X to the very same guy you beat in a previous fight.
but pac is a champ at multiple weights: 112, 122, 126 and soon at 130. calzaghe isn't.
my list 1. pbf 2. pac 3. calzaghe 4. hopkins 5. jmm 6. hatton IF (big if) hatton wins vs. pbf, he goes to #2 with calzaghe still @ #3 and pbf...
#3 above jmm. the juarez fight didn't do anything to enhance jmm's resume. jmm beat the guy who lost 2X to the guy he previously beat (barrera).
9-3 or 8-4 for Calzaghe are acceptable scores for this fight. one judge had it 120-108, a shut-out which is totally ludicrous.
hmm... if pac beat a shot barrera, then marquez won against a shot barrera too... so, what is marquez doing at #3 p4p? :huh
he's top three now behind pbf and pac.
yep. i don't think hops can beat calzaghe with the performance calzaghe put out tonight.
yep. calzaghe made a believer out of me. top 3 p4p he should be right now. i think he definitely wins vs. hops too. he is definitely a great,...
not that major an upset. hatton may be the underdog but he's definitely a live one.
yep. quit is definitely not in pac's vocabulary. baby bull has the advantage of being the natural bigger guy but pac has the power and speed...
close fights??!! 10-2, KO8, 10-2 :rofl:patsch:-(
well, old ass barrera also hit jmm way too much than i expected in their fight. that's why jmm was kd'd by mab. seems like this is a clear...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
i remember pac even outlanded mab in jabs... there is an error in those stats. :huh