Lopez might be the best choice. In any case, it's going to be a lighter fighter; gravity isn't so hard on them.
- No, they had declined about equally - Yes, Hagler fought better fighters between '83 and '87 (not by that much though), but that wasn't what I...
Nope. And nope.
No it isn't :huh
How did I know you'd come straight back with this argument? Age is just a number; fighters wear differently. Hagler had been in with many more...
Right, if you're using that Hagler then I'll use the Taylor version of Hopkins. Fair?
Yes, they both started their careers using a similar well-rounded method, but branched off in different directions with age; Hagler became a...
That, and the superior jab part (I've seen some other major anomalies in this person's writings on other subjects, too).
I saw someone mention you as one of the classic section's most knowledgable posters not too long ago. I laughed. :lol:
Marvin Hagler could perform anything to a high standard, or at least use more techniques and possess more attributes than anyone else I know, but...
Hm, nice. I think Ortiz would make my top ten.
Archie Moore Ike Williams Marvin Hagler Willie Pep Jose Napoles
You still have a hook for a hand, depending on the day of course, sometimes it is a claw.
TBooze has a hook for a hand. TBooze is not a fan of the Young Corbetts.
Williams-Montgomery II is the fight I'd most like to see.
