yes but your aim should always be to add to the conversation at hand . not just a random thought that comes to you mind DIP****
THATLL DING DANG DO FOR ME......... i love sky sports sometimes
and this idiotic opinion serves what purpose in this thread TROLL
i think 10 oz glooves can only be good for safety in the sport a punch will still do the trick in either gloove but i preety sure it wont have...
:nut like i said in your opinion it went to the wrong man but for it was close at a push napa but i wouldnt argue either way
its peaple like you that call a close fight that didnt go the way you thought it should . stop crying you think it was wrong way but it was close
stop crying foul if you call this close fight a robbery . then you dont know boxing and thats why the word disgracefull decision or robbery...
stop calling it a disgrace and a roberry the only thing wrong with the scoring was how wide parris had it but it was close cant argue either way
that was a test for groves got hit to often for such a poor opponent
grooves got caught in that first round a couple of times hes needs to tighten up both his defence and his muscles looks a little fleshy for me
IT WAS CLOSE FOR ME BUT . i wouldnt argue either way but parris was too wide and as for robpalmer135 ^^^^ dont quit the day job
he didnt make any concesions either though did he you know he could have admited that GBP CAN DO IT IN AMERICA
i mean i cnt feel sorry for warren the situation is hes made millions from amir in return amir has had well guided carear thus far and as...
is oscar up at 154 not a bigish puncher im not disergring with you
considering floyds fought a HOF up at 154 the size of shane wont be anything new
