Eubank was 32, hardly ancient and he was totally dominated by Calzaghe in his first true step up to world class.
Yes there are. Again, I don't think it's a bad fight as I do rate Monroe as a top 10/15 type fighter but whilst the top 10 are fighting each...
Not a bad fight tbh, but not great either. For such a bogeyman, Charlo seems to be targeting people's leftovers.
Hughie UD.
He was a mandatory and Golovking was the champion. And if you really want to look at it he had just beaten Sam Soliman who himself was coming off...
Was Martin a world champion and top 10 ranked at the time of their fight?
And Joshua was nearly stopped by a 41yo inactive Wlad
Was it balls or his head? This is actually relevant as each folicule would provide a better result.
No he's had 1 official in a fight I believe he won.....but if he failed a test I still wouldn't try to defend him like so raving homosexual fanboy.
Was it from his balls or his head?
So what exactly has Charlo done to warrant such attention then?
You do realise you are the complete definition of an obsessive fanboy.
w I'm 60/40 in favour of Derevyanchenko. Although I'm a fan of both and Jacobs' length and power will pose a problem I'm in the mind set that...
Going by a Derevyanchenko victory. 1. Derevyanchenko 2. Canelo 3. Jacobs 4. Andrade 5. Charlo 6. Brant
Dropped by two of the hardest hitters in recent memory and arguably ATG heavyweight punchers at that.....not really embarrassing is it.
