Some of these American writers are a joke, major superiority complex.
How good was this guy in his prime? I only saw him towards the end of his career when Hamed broke him down in 8, and then later against Scott...
Still sitting on the fence for now, but I think it's going be clear cut one way or the other, nothing controversial.
Controversial decision or a DQ. Can't ever see it I think Hopkins has indicated he's retiring after this one.
He was a shadow of himself, lost his dedication the minute he won a world title.
Hamed was lightening fast in his early days but more with the single shot than the flurries Jones could produce.
He looked terrible against Kelly and that was at 126. From what I've heard Toney didn't turn up for that fight. Anyway I'm not disagreeing that...
Ok I got drawn into making personal remarks because like I say you got under my skin, but I'll quit that as it gets a bit juvenile going down that...
Hamed was very fast and elusive at 122.
Ok I admit it you got under my skin a bit with the level of abuse you spit out against certain fighters (except Hatton, keep that up) and then how...
You're underestimating Calzaghe's heart.
Lighten up, you said you were prepared for the backlash. You dish it out about a fighter who a lot of people support you're gonna take some...
You can judge a man by the company he keeps.
Stop being a condescending (showing or implying a usually patronizing descent from dignity or superiority) wanker.
If the title of this thread was "could have" instead of "would have", it would make more sense. Hamed 16 or 17 odd world title defences, murderous...
