' The anti-Froch... Hehehehe,.....
I've said in many posts that I didnt think Dirrell was acting. Now I have seen it on TV where they did a super up close and psychological...
Ok, let me elaborate. Ward has only ONE win. Just a single win. Froch has three really good wins. Pascal, Dirrell, and Taylor....
Therefore this is probably the only way to have Ward as no. 1.
True, if Kessler is not in someone's top 3... then Ward beat someone who is not a real top fighter - someone who was exposed. And then Ward surely...
I dont think people underrate him. He is good, and would probably beat Dirrell right now. He is just so goofy and ridiculous that people have no...
Either he does it on purpose... Or because he needs more training before he fights as a pro... It is like a longjumper in the olympics who...
This is what boxing needs... A boxer good enough to call off the bull****... Ward happily played along, and Dirrell is too inexperienced to...
Dirrell did hit below the belt a couple of times but I think it was unintentional. He did not hold much at all. All in all I feel Dirrell...
So little love for Dirrell..... :/ Had I written Calzaghe, Adamek, or Toney - the love would be flowing..... :)
IF they fought now who would win? Dawson-Dirrell 60-40. If they fought in 3 years who wins? Dirrell-Dawson 70-30. Who is more intelligent?...
1 Andre Ward (beat Kessler) 2 Carl Froch (beat Pascal, Taylor, and Dirrell - if Kessler is not ranked at least 3rd, then Froch's wins should...
People like different things. I think Dawson looks and acts like a goof ball. Dirrell beats Dawson by about a million on every possible level...
1 Andre Ward 2 Carl Froch 3 Mikkel Kessler 4 Lucian Bute 5 Andre Dirrell 6 Arthur Abraham 7 Librado Andrade 8 Robert...
Much of this I agree with, but Dirrell did very little intentional holding.
