thats exactly the point im trying to make... but it can only be based on the outcome of the fight
so more than anything else.... you have high level pressure fighters and low level pressure fighters & the quality of your opponent.. as...
ight... when a elite level pressure fighter loses does that make their "applied pressure" bad because they lose? thats what i'm trying to fig out...
so by your definition.... who is a great pressure fighter then?
no you did... i understood what your saying my response to that is someone like margarito was a great pressure fighter even though he would get...
thats what im saying though.... there has been no perfectly unbeatable pressure fighter as far as i know... thats why im saying either you have...
thats my whole point.... you can not jam "pressure" into compartments because you can be what people say is "horrible" at pressure fighting... yet...
everyone does a good job of "applied" pressure until they lose margarito hatton juan diaz angulo there will always be someone to break down...
rafael garcia (the guy who tapes floyds hands) said floyd would probably win and he worked with both of them not sure if he was just saying that...
exactly... see what im saying.... you cannot put pressure in little compartments by calling good pressure "applied" pressure and bad pressure ......
you see my point.... the concept of "applied pressure" or whatever its called is TOTALLY subjective..... because at the end of the day its just...
yo stay off my dick you **** boy... you been on my pipe since i entered this forum.... don't keep your smirk ****ing bull**** away dog honestly.....
so someone define effective agression
my point is who is to say its intelligent or not intelligent if either way it is successful... thats my point.... pressure is pressure but either...
nah... **** that i never heard of a fighter losing applying "intelligent pressure" or a fighter winning using "horrible pressure" the only thing...
