NO NO NO! He lost in his 20's! HIS 20'S!!!
Rest easy, Frankie, and good job.
Fair enough!
I disagree with the notion that one can just shrug away the deficiencies in his competition and merely say "Well he fought who was out there, so...
First Arizona world champ has a nice ring to it though.
Well, they're French...…...how hard could that have been?
This. I've always kind of discounted Foster and felt like a contrarian about doing so but the reality of it is, it's easier to look amazing when...
My inclination is to also go with Whitaker, though Tendler has a strong claim too. More remarkable might be that Tendler fought in an era when...
Excluding switch-hitters...….e.g., Hagler and Chiquita Gonzalez for example do not qualify. Strictly southpaw. Is it Saldivar? Tendler?
Nobody takes things as dramatically out of context who isn't a troll. Or just uneducated. Anyone's guess as to which you are. Kind of...
Oh please yourself. Curry was the best welter in the world from at least '83 to the point of the Honeyghan loss. If YOUR farts linger that long,...
I think you're too hung up on this "20's" thing. As you should already know, boxing ability and "primes" have zero to do with chronological age....
If you think Curry was in his prime when he faced Jacquot……...well, you just roll with that, that'll be fine I guess.
At their respective primes, gotta go with Curry; Palomino, for all this strength, stamina and body-punching, was just too "there" to be hit.
@Jel , here's how I had it just a while ago. Superb fight.
