Round 5 on were all AA's , He was landing the hard effective shots.. whilst taylor only threw double jabs and occasional hooks , many of which...
It doesn't matter.... Lumbering forward to brawl doesn't win a boxing match... landing punches does... ESB is full of dumbass motherfuks now I swear..
STfu please, AA was winning the fight it was easy to see.... he only lost some of the early rounds
Yea .no one is even talking about that... Froch got Rocked and was obviously stunned badly.... I think Kessler and AA both with give Froch HUGE...
NP! :) .... David UK is just another nationalistic , bias , non-objective british boxing fan... he should just stay in the british forums ...
Pacquiao
I agree with you about Berto - Collazo ... Berto was landing the cleaner more powerful shots .... But I thought Malinaggi outboxed Diaz and that...
I admit that Dirrell ran like a *****, but that doesn't mean he didn't win... it was a pretty clear decision for Dirrell in my mind... anyone who...
you're so bias it makes me sick... I was rooting for Froch and I can't stand Dirrell, but I am not ****ing ******ed... You don't win Rounds on...
I am a fan, he is a very smart fighter with explosiveness and LOTS of power in both hands.
Because Froch is a much stronger fighter and wanted to Brawl... If Dirrell went Toe to Toe like you wanted him to , he would have lost ... HE...
This is a very inaccurate statement ... you clearly are either bias or didn't watch the fight.
Dirrell fought like a ***** and got hit, that doesn't mean he didn't win... Boxing is about landing punches , something Dirrell did and something...
Good analysis , he does have a fighting style like he has RJJ like relexes, where he is quite the opposite
so ****ing ignorant sometimes ... not everyone is a sheepish nationalistic ****wad like you. I don't give a **** which country a fighter is from.
