They were all movers in terms of the accepted boxing sense. You think Holyfield losing to Donald when he was a month off of 42 years old proves...
Even if this were true,and I haven't watched the fight for years,it wouldn't put his status above very good .imo
I think the premise that Frazier was damaged goods gets very overplayed.He looked pretty much the same old Joe in his second fight with Quarry,...
No friend ,it's a great idea, have fun with it! Its only opinions after all.
Some of the last 50 years Hamsho isn't beating include,imo. Griffith Tiger Giardello Kalambay Hopkins Jackson McClellan Pavlik Taylor Martinez...
Yes ,it was played up in the press and they really didn't like each other.
Eubanks went life and death with second /third raters like Dan Sherry Thulani Malinga Rav Close x2 And avoided the top Yanks. Lamotta fought...
Wharton didnt have half the engine on him Lamotta did.He allowed Eubanks to fight at his own pace.
Not only were Tillman Oquendo Tillis Donald Movers, they would have all beaten Lastarza, the most protected heavyweight of the 1950's.
Who? Why? How?
He would give Barkley a tough night.
It's a popularity contest ,imo.Fame not Greatness.
Rough Rex,v Fast Floyd, whom do you like here?
Two years, with two fights against third raters didn't help. I was working in Algeria at the time
I thought I would do this for comparison purposes . Pulev v Frazier Who Why? How?
