He did very well against them!? Malinga and Watson couldn't touch him with their jab
http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist//ITN/1992/09/19/BSP190992009/?s
? Eubank was eerily good at avoiding full impact of long left jabs and would shift in with own jab so beautifully, untelegraphed at the right...
Eastman was actually quite good Wright was a well-grinded result against an almost impossible style, Calzaghe was another almost impossible style...
Wlad struggled to lay a glove on Haye (though admittedly when he finally did in the 6th, the fight was over)... and he's streets ahead of Frank in...
Neither were close around the time they fought eachother. Watson was giving Eubank disgusting, disturbing stick (deep and sick), and Eubank was...
I don't even know if he'd lay a glove
Bruno would not wipe Haye out. Honestly.
Shame that Leonard, Chavez and Mosley aren't polled, or Norris, Ike Williams or Meldrick Taylor
Benn would've killed Leonard or Hearns. Collins would've been schooled by Leonard and massacred by Hearns. Eubank would've powered Leonard out...
He just didn't possess the technical skill to get in position...
It was clear as day that DeGale should've threw a double hook to the body to set up the right hand.
DeGale wasn't technically able to close the gap, cut the ring, step in with a double jab or set up a right hand. Basic stuff at professional...
What is this hanging onto DeGale stuff and even denying defeat. He lost because he wasn't good enough, tough enough or brave enough. He lost fair...
Royalty :lol:
