He did what he do and the ref allowed it. Holyfield fought his entire career using dirty tactics and Lewis used to clinch by leaning over his...
Wins every second against a guy who might’ve been better than anyone Holmes beat=dubious at best
It should pretty obviously be Wlad bc he unified.
Posting bc its never mentioned here: [MEDIA]
Top level: 0-2 against Wilder but came close to winning each fight and was pretty old, especially for the rematch. Top 5: Wiped the floor with...
Ruddock. Maybe Coetzee.
[MEDIA]
Ask yourself how they performed at top level, contender level, top 20 level, and top 30 level. Everything will make more sense to you.
The only other contender you picked who actually beat a top 5 contender is Zhang, who is also a poor pick. It’s pretty clear that you have it out...
Ortiz has a contingent of people whining about him for being old and losing to Wilder, but was an excellent contender. Like I said, awful pick.
Bruno was a title holder and Ortiz is an awful pick.
Joyce’s accomplishments are better than 99s Foreman’s, let alone Gonzalez. He just burned out.
90s is George Foreman and Jorge Luis Gonzalez, hands down. None of the other decades even come close.
9/10, and the guys from this era show how hard it is to recreate what he did. Fury--Has/had the talent, but rarely stayed active and likes...
Holmes, because George has absolute garbage on the bottom part of his top 10.
