:lol: well, langford is better than both of them in my book. he's like a prime raquel welch. [IMG]
Greb, but I wish there was some fight footage of him. he has the better resume imo.
but at least jones never quit in his corner. almost every great fighter was stopped at some point in their careers. again, jones > chavez.
114-113 cotto
let me help everyone out here, jones was better.
Do you think it's Moore, Hopkins, Foreman or someone else? for moore, if you say his bday is in 1916, this would include all fights...
:lol::lol::lol: this is the best post ever!
:lol::lol::lol: this is classic! if joe were black and a brit, the racist bums in the uk wouldn't care much about him. if he were black and...
jones was also fighter of the decade in the 90s. your ignorance is proven by saying that chavez got a draw with whitaker. you probably think...
actually, that song is better than his whole career. the brits are the best at music, can't say that for fighting though.
:lol: emmitt had to play vs the best to be champ. he couldn't chose to play vs veit, sobot, or pudwill.
he beat jeff lacy for the 168 title and a 43-yr old bhop by sd to win the other. jermain taylor beat hopkins twice, three years before joe.
i posted this in another thread but i wanted to start a new one because we don't have enough calzaghe threads on here :lol: Joe Calzaghe = very...
jones' resume is light years ahead of joe's. plus the fact that jones was named the fighter of the decade in the 90s secures his place as an atg....
i agree. joe went down a few times in his career so this could very well happen but i was never impressed with turpin's fighting style and joe's...
