Kahn vs Kovalev...
He was no "Super heavy" Too short, height+reach. Too high BF% NOT SKILLED enough!
http://static.boxrec.com/thumb/7/75/1229_alicooperblood66.jpg/450px-1229_alicooperblood66.jpg 201 pounds. He didn't weight over 214.5 pounds...
No, look at BF% and compare size instead. - "Weight matters less the higher up you go" - The most stupiest ever. So why are the modern...
A trully gifted boxer at Cruiserweight vs the HW champion - The result: http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Wladimir_Klitschko_vs._Eddie_Chambers...
Ali had more body fat at 215 then what Wlad has at 245. 201 vs 245 is about even in bodyfat precentage... Do you seriously think that...
No, you are!
Top 7!
On Tyson yes, on a regular dude - no. Compare them with the neck of the guy to his right.
I pick Wilder over Frazier. 5''9 vs 6''7 ...
No. 201 pounds lean vs 245 pounds lean... It's the same weight difference as Amir Kahn and Kovalev... I pick the bigger guy in both...
Just as the difference with Ali and Klitschko...
This is no H2H list. Otherwise Tyson Fury's the one!
201 pounds lean doesn't get the job done against 245 pounds lean. Too much size differential... Wlad vs Ali, is like Kahn vs Kovalev. 140...
Yeah me too!