So he's going to dominate the heavyweight division for years but the OP thinks he should fight a blown up super middleweight first.
How can it be worse than "No Mas"? Against Hearns he went out on his shield against a much bigger guy who had devastating power. With "No Mas" he...
I think pound for pound Jackson is certainly one of the top 10 hardest hitters in history. Having said that he wouldn't have beat Golovkin.
I've seen this fight. It was largely one sided.
You're correct of course it was no Hagler Hearns, but that fight was also always going to end only one way.
A genuine tough guy.
I'm a big fan of Golovkin, but I just can't see what he brings to beat Hagler. He's up against a fighter with an all time great chin, who's also...
Is there something wrong with you?
A strange one. Patterson was Olympic Middleweight Champion when it really meant something. I think he'd destroy Golovkin.
I've never been aware Joe Louis's right hand had a name. I would hazard a guess that most boxing fans including ones who know much more than me...
Yes that's true, but he was instantly back on course.
In this respect he reminds me of Hagler, you just never seem to see them even slightly distressed.
It was always Sonny Liston something like a 14 or 15 inch fist. He also had an 84 inch reach.
Of course he'd duck Briggs. Briggs can punch.
I don't expect Brook to go past 5 rounds more likely it won't go past 3 rounds. In fact it'll end the first time Golovkin lands a solid body shot.
