I'll have to meet you in the middle and just say that it's not as strong as his other assets.
Turpin had a fine jab, clearly it was the tool that enabled him to perform so well against Robinson. I just think that there's too many good...
I have to strongly disagree there mate.
Dempsey looks very fast at bobbing and weaving, just thought i'd put that out there before Tyson is handed that crown, i'd have to compare before...
Yeah, imo Ali is faster as a boxer, as in not only his hands, he's just a very fast man, the way he moves etc. Patterson is rapid with those...
Patterson and Ali are one and two, not sure of the order though.
On the first point,- Yeah maybe, hardly a measure of where they should rank on a list like this though. Like i keep saying, i'm aware of how good...
:lol::lol: on the first line, very nice:lol: We're agreeing to disagree then i suppose.
I know Stoney. My point still stands.
I'm aware fully on both men's careers, i'm not ignorant and underrating any of the contenders either man beat. Ali has a better resume. Say what...
The Duran argument i don't know about, it's there or there about. But Pep? He's getting a pass the way i see it. No doubt i'll be bombarded...
I just highlighted it in post 172, that's the way it seems to me anyway, either that or favouritism.
I agree with this as well. If you see 6 men in between that's fine, because there are at LEAST 6 men in the running and worthy. But any talk of...
I agree.
I'm going to expand on my earlier comments now. Notice i've already said that when commenting on who i think were the best fighters ever, is not...
