given it's a tabloid story, for "brawl" read "handshake and round of drinks"!
paul, he penned helter skelter.
lucky punches shouldn't connect at this level.
another reasonable thread hijacked. you have to be a spectacularly insecure fanboy to imagine op was having a pop at floyd, rather than gauging...
injury permitting ward has every right to defend his no 1 status in the ring. froch never stated he couldn't win a rematch, guilty of your own...
is failing to protect it a style?
i was wondering how long this would take. i can categorically state that you, fanboy, have no idea what you are on about.
you mistitled your thread. you meant to put "anti-pacquiao bias". are you not bored with having the same circular argument, over and over?...
it happens more often than not at football internationals, most people aren't bothered. especially those who ain't royalists.
what makes you say 70%? genuine question. i fear elite level may be higher even than that.
thanks, i'll check the link plus sources and rebuttals, of course. not on here so long true, but followed the sport since early 80s.
so "the man" didn't say? you've proven my point right there, nonito. pac stated he felt having blood taken weakened him, long before...
case in point. got a link for that quote?
no, the problem is posters with agendas presenting fiction as fact. you can believe whatever comes out of your hero's mouth, just don't expect...
she'd've struggled to tell him anything at all with her trap full of tony!:good
