:lol: :patsch
Intelligence, boxing ability-yeah, they all look good on paper, especially during an era of weak competition. no doubt you would have been arguing...
That's the advantage when you have actually SEEN the opponent; You KNOW that you know! Whereas people like you only THINK they know :yep
I'd give Animal Fletcher a good chance too. You know very little about hagler's opposition: Obel, Sibson, Hamsho, etc. Brush up on it will you?
The problem with that is you'd have to rely on Hagler coming down to that level. What if Hagler is pumped and in destruct and destroy mode the way...
i seen him. In fact I chose him over Trinidad. In Hagler's time tho I dont see him winning many matchups. Roldan would be too much for him....
Hagler would handle him with ease, probably by tko. One handed weight drained Roy Jones had little problem I scored it 9 rounds to 3 for Roy....
Micheal Nunn probably beats X. Kalmabay too. Those two were special
guys like Hopkins were dime a dozen in Hagler's day-too average. Hagler would eat him alive. So would Thomas Hearns and every other top ranked...
No. I'm not impressed by Starliing. Frankly, I'm not impressed by any of your fighters. He's mediocre.
Good choice Teeto. Terry would win easy
that's what happens when you wind up in the hall of fame, set the record for defenses in your own division, humble a legend, and **** off the fans...
You're right, it's not up for debate when Terry already proved his superiority in the ring. I'm definitely convinced he's on a whole other level....
the way he figured out Leonard and Hearns?
This is what's always bothered me, leaving me with that ripped off feeling that I first felt in November 1982. I was eagerly looking forward...
