You see, the size obsession. Apart from the fact you're talking garbage.
Apart from the fact it's difficult to decipher your incoherent posts due to your incredibly concise grammar, I stated that Wlad would beat Folley...
But it is an obsession,there's hardly a post where you don't mention size or weight. I would suggest to you that 200pound Zora Folley was...
You see, the weigh go obsession again.
This gets better.
Well Ali and we're talking prime would use his faster jab, faster hands, faster feet, greater ring savvy to dominate Wlad. He'd use lateral...
I'm not so sure you can say it's them Mac. I can't see any evidence of "inoculation marks"
You're absolutely obsessed with size you just can't see through it. I don't think there's a post on here when you don't mention it.
What's all that about? He started a reasonable thread between 2 great fighters why the hostility?
I like Qawi,but I think Louis would beat the **** out of him. I don't think it would even be close.
Listen. Wlad is bigger than Ali, so that makes him better. End the thread.
The thing is in the bodyline series Larwood hit batsmen and took wickets when England weren't even employing bodyline tactics. Also bodyline was...
Bigger? Ok, Stronger? I'd probably dispute that. Fitter? Not in a million years.
"The facts" that Wlad is faster than Ali was you mean? None of Ali's opponents knew how to cut off the ring you mean? Those "facts"?
I'm rendered even more speechless by the page.
