really where did i say he lost to every big fighter he faced all it shows is you didnt read what was said, :huh :think Size gave him problems if...
Exactly i don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend.
Yeah i love tyson but Come on the man really was a lot less then the myth crated by his hype.. ( i was stupid enough to bet on him over Lewis...
Really all you have is insults you have no knowledge nothing to back up the point you try to make... So again who were all these great fighters...
I hope not i think its more likely he just old.
Suure and let me guess ruddock was an atg right :rofl you talking about being objective :lol: And my alias is hard to pronounce and type? you...
Holmes himself even admitted he was past his prime and did not even have the chance to train for the fight. Using only 39 and really isn't good...
Yeah i watched it for free and with that undercard i was still thinking damn i still want my money back ;)
Its kind of hard to say ruddock at his peak when was it when he lost to tyson twice or before then if it was its hard to gague because he wasnt...
Tyson looked great against smaller fighters but when they started getting larger around 6'3 and could box moderately well Tyson had a load of...
Well its kind of hard because the best matchups Ruddock ever had he lost them all.. Razor's power is overrated i think you are thinking of his...
Precisely...
Larry Holmes 38 washed up. " Tyson looked great against smaller fighters but when they started getting larger around 6'3 and could box...
Are you shitting me? Ruddock has a good pedigree,:patsch Who the hell did he ever beat that would make you think he would stand a chance...
:lol::lol::lol:
