Bruh :qmeparto: That killed me
I think Jeffries offensive arsenal is the biggest factor in why he should beat Willard, who's chance of winning is almost solely based on out...
I'll go with the more modern fighter, Jeffries.
That's a nice comparison Ed. I think it's fair to say Jeffries wouldn't have been doing much back peddling. It just seems like your classic boxer...
If the worst we can say about him is that his style did him no favours then he's going to be rated pretty highly. I mean, if you don't rate his...
Comparing eras and all that jazz
Is it cheeky to mention it took Joshua 11 rounds to knockout the 41 year old former champ that hadn't fought in a year and a half.
Bowe's an interesting one to consider. If he's coming to fight and bringing a lot of pressure, Larry isn't going to be given the space to throw...
To keep it simple, depending on how you feel about the strength of his era, it's perfectly reasonable to have him in your top 10 heavyweights. His...
I can see either fighter winning this one. Okay, Larry has all the tools to beat Foreman, but like it's already mentioned, Holmes got seriously...
Willard showed very good punching technique at the point he knocked Johnson out in the 26th round. Surprising hand speed as well for a man of his...
A rough top 10, most picks are interchangeable. 1. Harry Wills 2. Sam Langford 3. Ken Norton 4. Peter Jackson 5. Tim Witherspoon 6. Archie Moore...
Why does no one ever consider both sides to this? Okay, Marciano isn't the mobile target, but there is a guarantee that Joshua has to make...
the only sports writer who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of the fight was Bill Cunningham of the Boston Post. He said "It looked...
