thats better. and i agree with you. kessler beat top rated SMW's before he fought calzaghe.
you're right.... 2 wins against hopkins tops anything kessler has done. care to give an opinion why you think i'm wrong?
that's on a par to posting blindly to back up what you think. "obvious" and "delusional" for me refers to people who try to close arguments like...
aye thats the bottom line. if dawson has a bigger one lined up then bigtime props to him. otherwise he's going to be left holding his dick in...
i'm going for taylor simply because i think he's a better fighter than kessler and will move up without too much problem.
taylor's dodging froch - what a joke. i guess froch is 'unlucky' that taylor has already fought pavlik twice and hopkins twice - or else he'd...
and the WBC has the audacity to say they are "disillusioned" with dawson's decision.... maybe it's because he has the balls to chase more...
that's exactly right - and why calzaghe never fought hopkins when it mattered. calzaghe, although an excellent fighter, has made a habit of...
good post. i agree too. but at the end of the day wlad's going to be able to impose himself and open up without worrying about any "sam peter's"...
if you want to know if a fight is made - or getting close to being made - check fightnews. they are sound and don't rumour-monger.
that reminds me when i was on 'boxingbanter', a predominantly british board, and one poster got banned for crowing after hatton got spanked by...
thats a conundrum though.... call me cynical but joeø's history is to avoid the fights that really matter. it's 10am in denmark and i haven't...
weighing in for a fight doesn't translate simply because itøs agreed. read my above post - and it's also about the natural weight of the fighter...
apologies....i thought you were questioning what i posted rather than anything else...
but you also havent put your balls on the line...so i'm not going to repeat the question if you're not prepared to answer it
