i take back what i said its good if it was for that reason...:yep :good
they've got to be kidding. Who do you people think would win? Toss up?:rofl
and against each other again, is this true?
nah, i can't rate him over spinks..but i thought he would be higher than 90's with his wins but the best names on his resume(Duran and SRL) were...
i also forgot wheres camacho?:huh the guy has fought almost every great out there win and lose and what are those 2 changes you have been thinking?
calslappy :gayfight
its really hard to make a list even a top 50 one..you have to consider every fighter and must have grade A boxing knowledge, what he did, who did...
bump in case someone miss my post..
i don't think theres any other lucrative opponent for pac at 140 except hatton.. look at the top guys at 140 Dhop malignaggi torres holt...
i think whitaker should be top 15, lewis i think should be higher, pancho villa should be lower, salvador sanchez is a bit high for a guy with...
yup same thought i had.. perhaps theres just some bad nights when you get caught, or perhaps just styles..
ponce de leon if not for his power would look like some dumb sack of **** inside the ring. And his fights wouldn't also be exciting if not for his...
nope...marquez is just superior skill wise than calzaghe. Calzaghe may be better acheivement wise but jmm is better as a fighter
i'd pic JMM in a head to head matchup, JMM is a more better at counterpunching than hopkins. The only problem hopkins had in that fight was lack...
i never imagined you're already old... no offense but most of your reasoning sounded like you're still 14 year old anyway nice pics...way to go!...
