Sam Peter on the strength of giving a bunch of good fights after I got into boxing and a bunch of funny interviews.
Yes, at least for anyone who is honest about what they've seen.
Left out Foreman openly ducking Tucker. Otherwise, Tucker would've been lineal champion.
If you don’t include the context of the Holyfield fight. We know what happened when Holyfield had the rematch at 100%.
lol no. Froch is one of the greatest overachievers of the last twenty years. He deserves credit for that, not absurd ratings in h2h match ups.
Bowe, Lewis, and Holyfield were better. And McCall beat a full strength Lewis if you want to go the paper route.
On paper only.
It’s more of a tangent because Moorer and Foreman weren’t the best either. It only really matters to a subset of boxing nerds that Briggs held...
That’s a whole lot of excuses for a guy who just wasn’t as good as Benavidez. Froch was closer to Plant’s level.
How about Froch being very slow and easy to hit?
Much more dominant at his level of opposition than Froch was against the same level.
There go your feelings again. I said Plant would go up early on the cards and it would be up to Froch to close the gap. Froch was never on the...
You're the king of pretending landslide unanimous decisions were close.
Your feelings, bro. Your feelings.
I like Froch and don't like Benavidez at all as a person. But Froch wouldn't beat him.
