Thawk99, Cellzb, SDSfinest, Rudyard, MrototaP4P, BBallcunt11, Nallege AKA whipsatass, PrinceN, Uncle Roger, Michigan Warrior, bladegunner.... and...
Ahh. :good But being in their era doesn't necessarily mean he'd start as a pro at '77, and follow the same path of moving up. Actually, I don't...
:huh How are you coming to this conclusion when there's no time frame to actually reference?
:lol: nice job boxrec ranger. You're knowledge, or attempts to prove it, are just laughable. :patsch LIke I said in my post earlier, 135...
:lol: Pulling the "If you knew anything about boxing..." after the **** you've said? Really? You haven't even said WHAT amatierish qualities...
:patsch :-(
Going with Cloud (mid rounds TKO) and P-Dub in a close fight.
:lol: No, I didn't numbnuts. I enjoyed that fight. I guess you didn't see the name Yuriorkis Ganmboa instead of John Murry for THIS fight.
He has to be a troll. No one can seriously be that stupid.
Never said it was the amatuers dumb****. :patsch You asked "who gives a ****" about his amatuer background. Having an extensive amatuer background...
There's no reason to suspect Rios would do that. Guzman lacked dedication. Rios does not.
That's what concerns me. Gamboa is not only accurate, but he throws solid combinations with excellent speed.
I think Rios shoudn't even be at 135 anymore. His last fight the dude just looked dry and gaunt as ****. I think that's the one thing that...
:patsch Just about any trainer you ask. I mean, you HAVE noticed that those with an extensive amatuer career tend to make better pros then those...
You are either: 1. Just a horribly stupid, STUPID person or 2. Doing a great impression of the typical ESB floyd fanboy :yep
