Same opinion.
Ezz
I'm not too high on longevity either but there's no doubt Wlad's stock will rise in the eyes of general boxing public if he continues his domination.
I'd say it would have been more like hard fought clean decision win for Tyson.
Rooney-Tyson beating reckless Holyfield of the 80's - yes, that's possible. To walk right through Holyfield - don't think Tyson or anybody can...
What about the time when Toney was Vitali's number 1 contender and he chose to fight Danny Williams instead?
Despite Tua being a limited fighter some of them might wind up getting brutally knocked out.
Card 2. Far more intriguing for me.
It's strange but I don't see Burley's name in Robinson's resume!:lol:
Langford has: Gans - lightweight Controversial (?) draw against Walcott - welter Ketchel - middleweight Wills - heavyweight
What's even more remarkable - no ducking as far as i know. Langford and Greb usually named as having two other greatest legacies.
His fight with Harris was one the most exciting modern heavyweight battles.
He was definitely past his prime - after he lost by TKO4 to Maskaev breaking the ankle in the process - he was never considered a seriuos threat.
It would have been interesting to see even if fights with someone from their time frame happened like not faded Rahman, Tua or Ibeabuchi.
Why do you think so, Keith? Why Chavez and not Whitaker?
