Meaningless question. There is no "modern training" and there most definitely is no "modern nutrition".
I'm puzzled that Braddock isn't even on your list.
Ali is ****ing hilarious there. "Hold on now, Joe Fra-zhuh not that fast."
I think Willard, who is somewhat underrated, probably wins under ~1915 rules, when there was a _lot_ more clinching, and shoving and even holding...
I could easily believe Weaver hit harder than Tyson. I think Tyson had A- power with A+ speed, and since those things almost never appear together...
Well, the reason for that is he's one of the most versatile fighters of all time, which is a large part of what made him great.
To me he doesn't even really look out of shape. He kind of looks like a power lifter....
Good general point but there are caveats. There was that guy he taunted by putting his hands behind his back against the ropes and proceeded to...
Undoubtedly, but I'm probably not knowledgeable enough to come up with many good examples. One that springs to mind for no particular reason is...
If true, that might explain a lot, at least to my mind. Interesting...
He made Vitali look far from invincible, as Larry Merchant rightly put it, but all he really did was survive till Vitali's shoulder gave out....
I think Tyson has an extremely good chance of taking out Wlad early and brutally, and edging by Vitali in an ugly, mostly boring fight fight that...
Conceivably? Of course. Probably? I'd say so.
Byrd didn't stop Klitschko. Come now.
Oh, this is one of those few where I'll bet the house and sleep tight. Not even gonna bother naming my pick. XD
