With a name like 'brownpimp88', why should I even take you seriously? The first letter of your name isn't even capitalized!
I don't know about that, but I can say 'Chuck Davey was useless.'
And by the way, I'm finished with you now. I'll leave it to other people to judge our debate.
Hmm. I'm pretty sure that Moore deserving a title shot before he received one is about as near to a fact as you can get in boxing. Unless you...
Yes, I am absolutely positive he deserved a title shot earlier than he received one. Have you read what you just wrote? You really expect Moore...
You are making a fool of yourself. Surely you must know that nobody would give Moore a title shot? It wasn't by his own choice that he didn't face...
What's wrong with a load of keep-busy fights if you're fighting the top opposition as well? Moore certainly fought a much better array than Spinks.
Don't underrate the fights against journeymen and nobodies - Moore got the chance here to practise his skills before trying them out on the better...
Probably because he was losing too often.
Three points: 1. An amateur career, however extensive, is not a suitable substitute for a professional one 2. Spinks having a better win:loss...
For a light heavyweight, he certainly fought a lot of lightweights and welterweights. Did he start out as one?
I don't exactly know why I left Stribling out, maybe I had the impression he was only twelve years old. I left Marshall out because he was better...
I really have no idea. It's like Ike Williams' knockout loss to Chuck Davey. Davey couldn't punch to save his life.
I knew you would mention Clark. I fail to see how he was a top light heavyweight. Please enlighten me.
That's what I've always said. Trying telling it to SuzieQ49... Actually don't bother, he'll just change his opinion to suit whatever argument he's...