2 great fighters fight each other twice, they get a win each, that happens sometimes don't you know.
Nah, the reason i never elaborated is because i've posted on it countless times. The whole thing about what happened in the rematch is so...
He quit because he was losing.
Yeah, you can look at it that way, i agree to an extent, it does mean that he could be hit though, which does qualify his defence as not being his...
I think because his power punching at other ranges was always so good, people always seemed to think his inside game wasn't strong, it's not true...
The only criticisms are to be made of his defence in my opinion, in whichever form you observe them as being weak. We're possibly talking about...
I agree with Pachilles
I think Buchanan has a great chance, i pick him
I had Whitaker beating Chavez by 8 points, he never embarassed him in terms of the nature of the fight, but he did on my card.
I don't know about any prejudices or biases in the media, but i was disgusted when Ring Magazine paraded Mosley all over the front of their issue...
:lol::lol::good
Hearns doesn;t have a great defence at 147 imo, but none of these guys are great inside men, or great enough at closing the distance for the job...
Yeah, good post on all points, i agree fully. I'd have him beating Tito, it would be a strictly lateral movement job though, (no shame in some...
I couldn't see Cotto beating Floyd myself. And he just walked Mosley down, i couldn't see Mosley beating him ever either to be honest. Haha look...
Yeah Popkins, a lot of people say this, that it was because of Oscar that Floyd won and not because of Floyd ad******g. But i saw it differently...
