Rodriguez admits to an intentional low blow and gets praised for "fantastic sportsmanship" :blood
Remember earlier in the thread when we all actually liked these announcers and found them charming for their accents, back before they had to...
What in the world was that deduction?
:patsch These guys think that should be a 10-9 round somehow.
If at the very worst you still cannot actually have the guy given the decision winning, then it's a bad decision and a robbery.
Yeah Rodriguez is pretty consistently disappointing IMO. I dunno why he still kind of has a reputation as an explosive action fighter or whatever.
If at worst it's a draw, then people are completely justified to call it a **** decision and yes, a robbery. Those exist for fights in which the...
No if you give Erdei the same benefit of the doubt you have to give Grachev to justify a 96-94 Grachev card, he wins by 9 or 10. Grachev at the...
You have to give the benefit of the doubt to Grachev in nearly every round he won to even arrive at a draw, never mind have him winning the fight....
Now Rodriguez will probably win this, beat Grachev, and DiBella won't make Rodriguez-Erdei as "La Bomba" will be looking for "bigger name...
You gave round 3 to Grachev :patsch
That's a draw. Where are you finding the sixth for Erdei? Also I'd say even with Erdei throwing less, those rounds were still a helluva lot...
This exactly. To even get the draw the announcers had (or the bizarre 1 point Grachev win one of them is now claiming :roll:), you have to give...
I just realized this ref looks like the French Steve Smoger.
Exactly how I saw the round and have seen the fight, except it should be 78-74 I think.
