Yeah triangle theories don’t work in boxing you melt.
Golovkin needs to wind his neck in.. only last week he accused yogi bear of curling one out in the forest, now this?
Young CHRIS would break down Callum molasses to his twiglet like body and make him quit. No one in that Smith family could live with the young...
if reading the word PUDDING on the internet makes you “sick to death” yet you won’t click ignore on the man who types pudding more times than I’ve...
Does anyone see any way the chinny robot can last twelve against the tubby little Mexican? Me neither.
Don’t blurt it out to the forum like a hormonal female, quietly put the kid on ignore and go about your business like you imagine a man would.
Fury did it before him. VLAD before him. Except they actually won the belts rather than buying the belts
Absolutely. Which is why his team won’t take the rematch.
Yeah when you’ve been following boxing a while pal you’ll realise “Eddie Hearns says...” a whole host of things
Not sure I’d immediately think of big iosh as a bully: chinny, robotic, no heart, no gastank but when you break it down further: Only fights at...
“Eddie Hearns said...” we just want that WBC belt, whether wilder or whoever has it is irrelevant Now “Eddie Hearns says...” we want fury and...
“He was winning the fight until he got ktfo” the most irrelevant piece of analysis there is One of the hallmarks of a casual fan is they think...
Coyle a completely shot fighter to my acute eye.
“Eddie Hearns paid...”
You’re offering evens on something which has been announced by one sides promoter? Good one