Hahahah you did not understand the sentence judging by your debating rules ! Well if you start like this we can then discount the Tiberi fight...
No, you are confused now. GGG lost to the best in Canelo (by your debating standards). Not Mc Callum who has a proven track record. GGG's best win...
Mc Callum beats GGG. You know, GGG barely got by Jacobs who really is a poor man's Mc Callum. Actually some thought GGG even lost that fight.
consult the term fact in the dictionary because you do not know what it is
Fact is Toney is unbeaten at middleweight.Fact is GGG has 2 losses.Fact is Toney has a better record than GGG.Now If that is the debate you want...
look man, go play that game with a newbie not with me. What is even the point of attacking Toney’s record when Toney has beaten the better...
this one
Most folks thought he won Mc Callum I.And Mc Callum is better than GGG himself, certainly better than anybody GGG faced.The Tiberi fight is out...
Nah Toney threw lots of punches in Mc Callum.You do not know what you talking about
Irrelevant this is about the best version of both fighters,
And I call bull on this as you pick GGG in pretty much any fantasy matchup!! Out goes all you credibility then. It became hillarous as you when...
This would be an all out of war. An action packed fight no doubt. Quawi by late stoppage
that is prime GGG I might add
Not suprising as you pick GGG in pretty much any fantasy matchup, irrelevant of the stylistic ingredients of the matchup. In a way, these...
That is exactly how I see it. GGG by close decision, maybe split decison. Johnson UD Canelo (with unbiased judges)