Fighters having their last title shots tend to be in top form for their title shot and not really be in the same shape for 2 bit...
Dempsey fans will be happy to know I'm picking him here. Huck is basic and hittable and only fights in spurts. He's bigger/stronger than Dempsey...
I think either Jeanette or Johnson said they fought about 15 times so there could be a few unrecorded or it could be exaggerated
Still a hell of a fighter pushing Marciano all the way in those fights. His legs reactions and workrate not quite once what they were, but still a...
No more so than your hero Dempsey, both have better wins at HW :yep
I have to hand it to you, this is a good response Burt, maybe I'm wrong and Dempsey wasn't near his best in the years he lost, or maybe those men...
Tua was past his best against Byrd though but yes Charles could bulk up in the modern era, make him stronger more durable with more weight in his...
You spelt underrated wrong ;)
By 'don't know how to make it clearer' you meant over simplify? ;) Tunney caught Dempsey time and again and knocked him down in the rematch....
Burt I acknowledge Dempsey was past his best but point to the fact Norton is judged too harshly on his losses at the ages of 35 and 37 to Shavers...
You've just demonstrated that you don't even know what technical boxing skill is. You're claiming Dempsey had good technical fundamentals. He...
Both Cooney and Willard were inactive for years and well past their best, Cooney an alcoholic, Willard 37 and out of the ring for 3years
1. You're reading comprehension is pitiful. 2. Quote where I said Norton is better technically than Gibbons. My initial post stated that Norton...
Not really as Tunney did have him in trouble and wasn't ko'd. The other fighters who hurt him but he came back to KO were of a much lower level,...
Reading comprehension lesson 1 'In terms of power, speed and accuracy I'd say Norton would be the best puncher Dempsey would have ever faced' - a...
