How can you be sure of this?
Harold Johnson was a fair bit better than anyone Jones faced.
Nine! But only if he wasn't affected by the wear and tear of each fight, and if Moore was at his peak. And by saying he'd 'win' them, I mean I...
Your logic is ****ed.
Bollocks! Valdez and Hearns were better, Griffith may have been on the same level.
Moore beat Maxim & Johnson for the title - both (particularly Johnson) more of a threat to Moore's championship than Charles was to Marciano's....
Hagler was more deserving than Duran for '80.
It's sad that Archie Moore never got a Fighter of the Year award, despite boxing over four different decades. I'd definitely have given it to him...
Yep. Muhammad Ali in 1978? For losing and winning the title to a novice? :huh
He was. He didn't have the brains to use a full arsenal of punches or defend against the incoming.
I'd say Jess Willard was a bit of a simpleton.
This is so exciting, I think I'm going to **** myself.
In that case, I need to find a picture of Kurt Cobain, pronto.
My nan actually bought that for me because she thought it was to do with boxing boxing.
:thumbsup
