commercial ass punk
:lol::good
Marquez though, who doesn't have great mobility or movement, outmaneuvred him to death in their first fight, which i scored for Marquez clearly.
I wouldn't be able to remember what snippet it's from now, but i remember watching him vs Baer, and Baer has hurt him and is mounting one of his...
Something that makes you think footwork might be good, don't really know what to advise though sorry.
I that supposed to be funny?
I enjoyed reading that JG.
Yeah, he apparently basically said **** fighting this guy, i'm boxing him from now on. There's not really a directly comparable Gavilan-esque...
I think Oscar does very well against this level of opposition, i.e not the very highest level of great fighter. Cervantes isn't going to be...
On Gavilan-Leonard, who knows? The highest level both men are at. Guaranteed to go the distance, i'd probably lean towards Leonard. Both are...
:good i think i've went into hyperpost mode, is my speed impressing?:lol: i need to relax for a bit
It gets brought up every now and then. I'd take Robinson by stoppage ultimately, too good an all out offensive fighter in my opinion. Hearns is...
:lol: yeah you're probably right IB, not good.
It's the bursts of energy which are key for him imo, and he can sustain them as well.
Well yeah, it's proven that such styles are presented with the best window of opportunity to beat Robinson. On a personal note, i'd favour him...