Exactly. But don't sweat it. That guy's a tool. Bute UD Froch and potentially stops him. The kid is just that much better.
Best post in this thread.
You are really are mentally deficient if you believe that Froch hits harder than Bute. Since you failed to respond to the rest of my laundry...
Right because that's the first thing I think of when I ponder the respective merits of someone posting 14,000 times in less than four years....
Last night's fight does not nothing to change my opinion of Ward, Froch, or Bute-- or respective match-ups between the three. Froch, however...
And if by sheltered you mean that I haven't authored 14,000 plus posts in a span of less than four years, than I readily concede the point.
How about Johnson? Bute shut him out. And Froch, well...... he pounded out a rather competitive decision. Tell me, what facet of Froch's game...
What the **** is that supposed to mean, your kind??
If you are referring to Bute, perhaps you ought to bottle it. Bute would outpoint Froch just as easily. Period.
Hello, Arran, you ****ing ******.
Blow me, you pasty skinned Harp peasant. Recall the days of "Irish need not apply?" Or what I call, the good old days?? :lol:
I don't give a flying **** when he turned pro, *******. He could have turned pro at 12, and he'd still lack the fluidity of Bute. We're through...
Ward. With all things being equal, and I think both fighters are a credit to the sport, I lend my support to a fellow American,
Ahhh...yes, the last refuge of the myopic. :-(
In terms of sheer talent, Bute is a class of above Froch and Kessler. Moreover, he hits with too much authority for Dirrell. Ward, however, is...
